<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Identity, Trustbacks, and Taste Mapping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clicknoise.net/online-identity-trustbacks-and-taste-mapping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clicknoise.net/online-identity-trustbacks-and-taste-mapping/</link>
	<description>Musings about music, technology, mobility, and culture, by Jean Hebert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:56:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clicknoise &#187; AOpenIDL</title>
		<link>http://clicknoise.net/online-identity-trustbacks-and-taste-mapping/comment-page-1/#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator>Clicknoise &#187; AOpenIDL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clicknoise.net/online-identity-trustbacks-and-taste-mapping/#comment-2043</guid>
		<description>[...] I haven&#039;t posted about OpenID in some  time. Not surprising, considering the weight I&#039;ve had to give to DRM, indie music, and related business, because of things like this occuring on a more-than-daily basis in recent weeks. Anyway, there&#039;s some big news in the area of decentralized identification systems. Now, not only has Microsoft stepped up to the plate and embraced the OpenID system, but AOL has followed suit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I haven&#8217;t posted about OpenID in some  time. Not surprising, considering the weight I&#8217;ve had to give to DRM, indie music, and related business, because of things like this occuring on a more-than-daily basis in recent weeks. Anyway, there&#8217;s some big news in the area of decentralized identification systems. Now, not only has Microsoft stepped up to the plate and embraced the OpenID system, but AOL has followed suit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clicknoise &#187; Truth, Taste and Wikis</title>
		<link>http://clicknoise.net/online-identity-trustbacks-and-taste-mapping/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Clicknoise &#187; Truth, Taste and Wikis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 23:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clicknoise.net/online-identity-trustbacks-and-taste-mapping/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] In a post last week I mused on the topic of trustbacks and their utility in rating the opinions of others as a bulwark against potential problems with music sharing sites like last.fm. Transposing this question to the matter at hand, could we map/moderate truth in the same way that we can map/moderate taste, by being as critical about the reporters as we are about the reported? And if so, how could a system of trustbacks be kept in check, to make sure no one became a privileged arbiter of truth illegitimately? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a post last week I mused on the topic of trustbacks and their utility in rating the opinions of others as a bulwark against potential problems with music sharing sites like last.fm. Transposing this question to the matter at hand, could we map/moderate truth in the same way that we can map/moderate taste, by being as critical about the reporters as we are about the reported? And if so, how could a system of trustbacks be kept in check, to make sure no one became a privileged arbiter of truth illegitimately? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

